Justine is a content writer at Sprintlaw. She has experience in civil law and human rights law with a double degree in law and media production. Justine has an interest in intellectual property and employment law.
Using Indigenous knowledge in a business can be powerful. It can also be legally (and culturally) complex.
Whether you’re creating products inspired by mātauranga Māori, incorporating Indigenous words or symbols into your branding, collaborating with iwi or hapū, or building a digital platform that shares traditional stories, you’ll want to get your legal foundations right from day one.
This guide is updated for current expectations and risk areas we’re seeing in the market (including modern online branding issues and the way IP is commercialised today). We’ll break down what “Indigenous knowledge” means in practice, how New Zealand intellectual property rights work, where the gaps are, and what you can do to protect yourself and (just as importantly) respect the communities connected to that knowledge.
What Counts As Indigenous Knowledge (And Why Businesses Should Treat It Differently)
Indigenous knowledge is a broad term. In Aotearoa New Zealand, you’ll often hear it discussed in the context of mātauranga Māori (Māori knowledge), but Indigenous knowledge can also include knowledge held by other Indigenous peoples, especially if you’re importing products, collaborating internationally, or operating in a global market.
In a business context, Indigenous knowledge might include:
- traditional stories, narratives, whakapapa-based concepts, whakataukī (proverbs) or oral histories
- design elements, patterns, motifs, carving styles, weaving approaches, and other cultural expressions
- traditional names, words, place names, and language elements used as brands or product names
- customary practices, healing knowledge, environmental management methods, or food preparation techniques
- knowledge about native species, their uses, and associated cultural practices
It’s “different” because Indigenous knowledge is often:
- collectively held (not owned by a single individual), sometimes across generations
- connected to identity and tikanga, meaning “permission” isn’t only a legal concept
- sensitive or restricted, with limits on who can share it and how it can be used
- not neatly captured by standard IP laws, which tend to focus on individual authorship, novelty, and fixed forms
So even if something seems “publicly available” (for example, a motif you saw online), it doesn’t automatically follow that it’s ethically OK to commercialise it - and it doesn’t mean you’re legally risk-free either.
How Intellectual Property Rights Apply To Indigenous Knowledge In New Zealand
New Zealand’s intellectual property system can still be useful when you’re working with Indigenous knowledge, but you need to understand what each IP right can (and can’t) do.
Copyright
Copyright protects original works like written content, artwork, illustrations, music, films, photographs, and sometimes certain design drawings.
It can help where Indigenous knowledge is expressed in a specific, original form (for example, a newly created illustration or written story). But it often won’t protect:
- ideas or concepts on their own
- styles or techniques (e.g. “a traditional style”)
- very old works where the copyright term has expired
- community-held knowledge that was never “fixed” in a form that copyright recognises
Practical tip: if you’re commissioning artwork or written content based on Indigenous concepts, make sure your contract clearly addresses ownership and permissions - not just “who paid for it”.
Trade Marks (Brand Names, Logos, Taglines)
Trade marks protect branding signs that distinguish your goods or services in the market (like your name and logo). If you’re building a brand using te reo Māori, Indigenous words, or culturally significant symbols, trade marks can be extremely important.
They can help you:
- stop competitors from using confusingly similar branding
- build trust and recognition over time
- increase business value if you scale or sell
But trade marks don’t automatically make cultural use appropriate. You still need to think about consent, relationships, and whether the branding could be considered misleading or offensive.
When you’re ready to protect your brand, filing early is often a smart move - especially before you invest in packaging, domain names, and marketing. In many cases, Register Your Trade Mark is one of the most practical steps you can take to reduce copycat risk.
Patents
Patents protect new inventions (usually products, methods, or technology) that are novel and inventive.
This is where things can get tricky with Indigenous knowledge:
- traditional knowledge may not be “new” in the sense patent law requires
- there can be ethical concerns if someone patents something derived from Indigenous knowledge without appropriate authority or benefit-sharing
- patenting may involve disclosure, which could conflict with cultural restrictions or confidentiality
If you’re developing a product that draws on traditional knowledge (for example, a wellness product, botanical extract process, or a tech platform built around cultural data), you should get tailored advice before publishing details publicly.
Registered Designs
Registered designs protect the visual appearance of a product (shape, pattern, configuration, ornamentation) if it’s new.
This can sometimes work well for modern products that incorporate Indigenous-inspired design elements - but it’s not a “free pass” to use cultural design. It mainly protects your newly registered design against copying, rather than recognising the underlying cultural origin.
Confidential Information And Trade Secrets
A lot of Indigenous knowledge issues are really confidentiality issues.
If a community shares knowledge with you in confidence (or on the basis it shouldn’t be publicly disclosed), your best protection is usually:
- clear confidentiality terms in writing
- tight control of who can access the information
- internal processes (need-to-know access, secure storage, staff training)
For many businesses, this is more realistic than trying to “fit” knowledge into copyright or patents. If you’re dealing with sensitive know-how, it’s worth understanding trade secrets and how to structure your agreements so the information stays protected.
Where The Law Doesn’t Fit Neatly (And The Risks If You Get It Wrong)
It’s completely normal to feel a bit unsure here - Indigenous knowledge doesn’t always fit neatly into standard Western IP frameworks.
That said, there are still real legal and commercial risks if you use Indigenous knowledge in a way that causes harm, confusion, or backlash.
Misleading Conduct And Brand Storytelling
If you market a product as “Māori-made”, “iwi-approved”, “Indigenous-owned”, or implying a cultural partnership that doesn’t exist, you can create risk under the Fair Trading Act 1986 (which prohibits misleading and deceptive conduct).
This can apply even if you didn’t intend to mislead. If the overall impression is misleading, it can still be a problem.
Practical examples that often trigger issues:
- using Māori motifs and language in a way that suggests cultural endorsement
- claims about origin, authenticity, or benefit-sharing that aren’t accurate
- “inspired by” storytelling that crosses into representing something as traditional when it’s not
Reputational Damage (Which Usually Moves Faster Than Legal Action)
Even where the law is unclear, public response can be immediate - especially online. If a community raises concerns about cultural appropriation or misuse, the business impact can include:
- lost customers and cancelled wholesale relationships
- platform takedowns or advertising account issues
- difficulty attracting investors or partners
- long-term brand distrust
This is why “legal compliance” is only part of the picture. The stronger approach is to treat consent, context, and relationships as part of your risk management.
Ownership Disputes With Collaborators
If you collaborate with an artist, a cultural advisor, a designer, a developer, or a community group, unclear IP terms can lead to disputes like:
- who owns the final artwork or brand assets
- whether you’re allowed to adapt or remix content
- whether the collaborator can re-use the work elsewhere
- how revenue is shared (and for how long)
These disputes are avoidable, but only if you document the deal properly before the project takes off.
How To Use Indigenous Knowledge Respectfully In Your Business (A Practical Approach)
If you want to use Indigenous knowledge in a way that’s sustainable (and not a future headache), the best approach is to combine cultural process with legal protection. One without the other usually isn’t enough.
1) Get Clear On What You’re Using
Start by writing down, in plain language:
- what knowledge, words, stories, designs, or practices you want to use
- where it came from (who shared it, what source, what community, what context)
- whether it’s already public, or whether it was shared with restrictions
- how you plan to use it (brand name, packaging, product design, marketing story, training, app content)
This clarity makes the next steps much easier - and it helps you spot what is “inspiration” versus what is culturally specific material.
2) Identify The Right People To Engage With
“Asking the right person” matters. Depending on the knowledge, that could mean:
- a particular iwi or hapū authority group
- the creator (for contemporary works)
- a whānau group connected to the kōrero (story)
- a cultural advisor who can guide appropriate process
If you’re not sure, it’s better to pause and ask than to guess and hope for the best.
3) Agree On Permissions, Boundaries, And Benefit Sharing
From a practical business perspective, you want the “rules of use” to be unambiguous. That includes:
- scope: what exactly can be used (and what can’t)
- purpose: which products, channels, territories, and campaigns
- duration: how long the permission lasts
- approval rights: whether the community/creator needs to sign off on final outputs
- benefit sharing: fees, royalties, profit share, scholarships, community investment, or other agreed benefits
- attribution: how credit will be given (or whether anonymity is required)
This is also where you reduce the risk of misunderstandings later, especially as your business grows, new staff come in, or you start exporting.
4) Put It In Writing (Before You Launch)
Handshakes and “we’re on the same page” chats are a great start - but they’re not enough when money is on the line, timelines get tight, or someone new joins the project.
Depending on the relationship, you might use:
- a collaboration agreement covering ownership, approvals, and commercial terms
- a licence arrangement allowing use of certain IP or cultural material under defined conditions
- confidentiality terms where knowledge is sensitive or restricted
For example, a properly drafted Collaboration Agreement can prevent the classic “we built this together, so we both own everything” confusion that causes disputes later.
And if sensitive knowledge is being shared, the contract should include a clear Confidentiality Clause (plus practical steps for keeping information secure), so everyone understands what can and can’t be disclosed.
Key Legal Documents And IP Strategies That Actually Protect You
Once you’ve built the right relationships and permissions, you still need a legal structure that protects your business and reduces risk.
Here are the protections we commonly recommend businesses consider when Indigenous knowledge is part of their product, brand, or platform.
Trade Mark Strategy (Before The Brand Gets Big)
If you’re using Indigenous words, names, or symbols as a key part of your brand, your trade mark strategy should be sorted early. Practically, that means:
- trade mark searches before you commit to packaging and a domain name
- filing the right marks in the right classes (goods/services categories)
- making sure your usage and marketing story matches what you can truthfully claim
This is particularly important if you’re investing in brand recognition (social media, influencer marketing, retail distribution) - because once you’re visible, copycats get bolder.
Licensing The Right Way
When a community, artist, or collaborator wants to retain ownership (which is common), licensing is often the best fit.
A well-structured IP Licence can set out:
- exactly what you can use and how
- what happens if you expand into new products or territories
- whether you can sublicense to distributors or manufacturers
- quality control and approval steps (critical for culturally sensitive material)
- payment terms (fixed fee, royalty, milestone payments)
- termination rights if trust breaks down or tikanga boundaries are crossed
This lets your business operate confidently, while respecting that the underlying cultural material may not be “yours” to own outright.
Confidentiality And Internal Controls
Agreements are essential, but they’re not magic. Your business should also have internal systems that match what you promised.
That might include:
- limiting access to sensitive knowledge to specific roles
- staff training on culturally sensitive material
- supplier and manufacturer controls (so designs and formulas aren’t “reused” elsewhere)
- clear rules about storage, sharing, and deletion of cultural information
If you’re building a product around know-how (methods, recipes, formulations, processes), confidentiality is often the “real” protection - and it’s why trade secret thinking matters as much as traditional IP registration.
Privacy And Cultural Data
Some Indigenous knowledge projects involve collecting personal information (for example, membership platforms, genealogy/whakapapa-related services, education platforms, or community programmes).
If you collect or store personal information, you’ll likely need to comply with the Privacy Act 2020. A clear Privacy Policy is one part of that, but you should also think about how consent is obtained, where data is stored, and who can access it.
Even if something is “legal” under privacy law, cultural expectations may still require more careful handling - so it’s worth aligning privacy compliance with community expectations early.
Key Takeaways
- Indigenous knowledge can intersect with copyright, trade marks, designs, patents, and confidentiality, but it often doesn’t fit perfectly within standard IP frameworks.
- If you use Indigenous words, symbols, stories, or design elements in your branding or products, you should manage both legal risk (like misleading conduct under the Fair Trading Act 1986) and cultural risk (like loss of trust and reputational harm).
- Clear agreements upfront are critical, especially for collaborations - define ownership, permissions, approvals, benefit sharing, and what happens if the relationship ends.
- Confidential information protections are often the most practical way to safeguard sensitive knowledge, particularly where “registration-based” IP rights don’t apply.
- A strong brand protection plan (including trade mark registration) can prevent copycats and reduce disputes as your business grows.
- If your project involves collecting personal information or cultural data, make sure you’re complying with the Privacy Act 2020 and matching your processes to what you’ve promised.
If you’d like help protecting your intellectual property, documenting a collaboration, or structuring permissions to use Indigenous knowledge in a way that’s legally robust and commercially workable, get in touch with Sprintlaw for a free, no-obligations chat on 0800 002 184 or email team@sprintlaw.co.nz.


